Back to Workflows

Post-Production Company Streamlining Media Transfers and Storage

Company Situation

The company operates in the post-production and media services sector, supporting film, episodic, and commercial projects. Their team includes heads of production, engineering, data operations, and film dailies specialists, reflecting a multidisciplinary setup. They work closely with external editorial teams and freelancers across various departments such as design and animation. Their workflow involves managing high volumes of video content for daily review, color grading, and company approvals, with a particular emphasis on maintaining color accuracy and efficient media delivery.

Existing Workflow

Their current process starts with ingesting footage primarily via hard drives or through Aspera links, which are then loaded onto internal servers. Remote team members access these servers through remote desktop solutions to work on editing, color grading, and conforming. For company review, they rely heavily on Frame IO for sharing color-graded reference videos and facilitating feedback, especially since companies and colorists are often remote and working on different monitors. Media and project files are also shared among internal teams and freelancers, using a combination of Frame IO and Aspera, while maintaining company-specific workflows depending on their preferences. Drives and server storage act as the central media repositories, with some use of proxies and reference files for review purposes.

Issues with the Existing Workflow

Multiple handoffs and tool-switching between ingestion, editing, color grading, and company review create inefficiencies. Reliance on physical drives and multiple file transfers leads to duplication and delays. Frame IO, while widely adopted, presents challenges with consistent color science and accurate real-time color evaluation across different devices and locations. Remote access to centralized servers adds complexity and potential latency issues. Variability in company delivery preferences necessitates customized workflows, complicating standardization. Coordination with external editorial teams and freelancers increases the complexity of media management and version control.

How Shade Would Change Their Workflow

Shade offers a unified platform that streamlines the entire media lifecycle from ingestion through post-delivery, review, approval, and final company distribution without the need for multiple copies or transfers. By integrating all stages into a single, seamless workflow, Shade reduces the friction caused by switching between disparate tools. Its advanced color science capabilities ensure consistent, real-time color fidelity for company reviews regardless of location or device, addressing one of their key concerns with Frame IO. Shade's platform would also facilitate easier collaboration across internal teams and freelancers by providing a centralized, cloud-enabled workspace that supports remote access without cumbersome server remoting. Additionally, Shade’s flexibility enables the company to accommodate varying company delivery methods within one system, simplifying project management and media sharing.

Benefits

  • Streamlined end-to-end media workflow from ingestion to company delivery
  • Elimination of redundant file copies and transfers, saving time and storage costs
  • Superior color accuracy and real-time color review for consistent company feedback
  • Simplified remote collaboration without complex server remoting setups
  • Centralized platform supporting internal teams, freelancers, and external editorial partners
  • Flexible delivery options customizable per company requirements
  • Improved version control and project transparency across all stakeholders