Back to Workflows
Post-Production Company Managing Remote Creative Teams
Company Situation
The company operates a post-production company with a remote team of editors, colorists, motion designers, and finishing artists. Their setup includes a small home-based server infrastructure supplemented by multiple workstations and Mac Minis. The company recently transitioned from a physical office to a fully remote operation to reduce overhead costs, supporting a team distributed across various locations. They handle high-resolution media from cameras like Alexa and RED, managing complex workflows involving proxies, trimmed files, and detailed color grading and effects work.
Existing Workflow
The company’s current workflow relies heavily on a combination of local servers and cloud services. They previously used LucidLink and Frame.io to enable remote access to media and collaboration across their team. Editors accessed machines remotely through Parsec to work on large media files, and the team shared assets through Google Drive and other general cloud storage solutions. Communication is integrated with tools like WhatsApp and Slack. Storage consists of approximately 25TB of local capacity, while cloud usage for testing and project sharing is roughly 1-2TB.
Issues with the Existing Workflow
High Costs: The company faced significant financial strain from paying multiple service subscriptions (LucidLink, Frame.io, VPNs, energy costs for server operation). LucidLink alone cost between $700 and $800 monthly.
Latency and Performance: The latest versions of LucidLink showed poor performance in their region due to reliance on Amazon S3 servers outside their locality, resulting in frustratingly high latency and unreliable access.
Fragmented Tools: Using multiple disconnected services for storage, media mounting, review, approval, and metadata tagging complicated workflows and increased operational overhead.
Energy Consumption: Running home-based servers for remote access incurs high energy expenses.
Version and Proxy Management: Managing proxies, trimming files, and handling different media formats (e.g., Alexa, RED) across several tools created inefficiencies.
How Shade Would Change Their Workflow
Shade consolidates the company’s media operations into a single platform that enables upload, remote mounting, tagging with metadata, review and approval, and archiving—all within one integrated environment. This removes the need for multiple subscriptions to separate tools, streamlining both cost and workflow management. Shade’s architecture reduces latency issues by offering a localized or optimized cloud infrastructure suited to the company’s geographic region, enhancing remote collaboration. The company can centralize storage for all media assets and proxies, share links easily with collaborators, and maintain organized folder structures supporting Adobe After Effects and other creative tools without reliance on Google Drive or Dropbox. Shade’s approach also reduces energy costs by minimizing the need for continuously running local servers.
Benefits
- Significant cost savings by replacing multiple cloud services with one integrated solution
- Lower latency and improved performance tailored to regional infrastructure
- Simplified media management with unified upload, tagging, review, and archive functions
- Enhanced remote collaboration for editors, colorists, and finishing artists
- Reduced energy consumption through optimized remote access and storage
- Better organization with centralized folder structures and metadata support
- Easy sharing of media links, improving communication and project handoff
- Scalable storage solution allowing smooth expansion of infrastructure as the company grows
Technologies Used
Want to see how Shade can improve your workflow?
Book a Demo