Back to Workflows

Media Production Company Streamlining Collaboration with Frame.io and Adobe

Company Situation

The company operates within the media production industry, focusing heavily on television content, particularly factual programming and true crime genres. Their team includes a senior technical director managing the production post arm, with responsibilities spanning digital assets such as video and audio. The company is undergoing a strategic shift in content style and broadcaster partnerships, marking a “discovery year” with evolving workflows and production models. The scale includes multiple production teams and upwards of 60 users involved in content review and collaboration.

Existing Workflow

Their current workflow centers around using Frame.io as the primary platform for media review and collaboration. Initially, Frame.io was used on a per-show basis, allowing small teams to work independently with ease. However, after Adobe’s acquisition of Frame.io, the company was forced to migrate all users under a single enterprise-level account, requiring centralized management of a large number of users and teams. The platform serves as a hub for producers, editors, and coordinators to share, review, and manage video assets.

Issues with the Existing Workflow

Cost Escalation: The enterprise licensing model mandated by Adobe has significantly increased costs, with annual contracts reaching prohibitive levels for a production-focused company. User Management Complexity: The shift to enterprise accounts restricts the ability for individual production teams to manage their own user access independently, creating administrative bottlenecks. Feature Limitations & Usability: The latest version of Frame.io (v4) removed key administrative metrics and features important to the company’s workflow, such as watermarking and effective user analytics, while introducing interface changes that disrupted media navigation and organization. Scalability Challenges: The platform’s design no longer aligns with the fluid, short-term nature of production teams that frequently form and disband, making it difficult to scale access efficiently without incurring high costs or adding managerial overhead. Reduced Platform Support: Post-acquisition, the platform has suffered from reduced development focus and resource allocation, resulting in a product that no longer fully meets the specialized needs of production companies.

How Shade Would Change Their Workflow

Shade offers a production-focused media review platform designed to accommodate the dynamic and distributed nature of media production teams. By enabling independent team management without forcing costly enterprise-level licensing, Shade aligns with the company’s desire to return to a more flexible production model. The platform is expected to maintain high-quality media review capabilities while providing better administrative controls, user-level security features such as watermarking, and a more intuitive interface optimized for quick navigation across multiple projects. Ultimately, Shade would streamline the company’s review workflows, reduce costs, and restore autonomy to individual production teams.

Benefits

  • Significant cost savings compared to enterprise-level licensing fees.
  • Flexible user and team management suited to short-term, project-based production workflows.
  • Enhanced security features like watermarking accessible without expensive upgrades.
  • Improved usability with intuitive navigation and project organization.
  • Dedicated support and development focus on production industry needs.
  • Scalability that matches the fluctuating size and structure of production teams.