Back to Workflows
Media Production Company Consolidating LucidLink and Private Media Cloud
Company Situation
The company operates within the media production industry, serving multiple editorial teams including remote global editors. Their workflows involve handling large volumes of video content that require ingestion, post-production, editing, coloring, delivery, and company review. Their team supports a variety of companies with differing preferences for remote editing solutions, which necessitates flexible, scalable cloud storage and media asset management (MAM) systems.
Existing Workflow
Currently, the company relies heavily on a private media cloud (PMC) as the backbone for data movement and storage. For remote editorial work, they use LucidLink to stream and edit proxies remotely. Their general workflow involves ingesting footage into their PMC, generates proxy previews, editing proxies via LucidLink, and conducting review and approval through third-party tools like Frame.io. Some companies prefer to use different solutions, so the company maintains multiple workflows including RDC tools like Jump or PCoIP for native camera editing on their PMC. They also use Signia for data transfer and occasionally incorporate Dropbox, Google Drive, or NAS devices depending on project requirements.
Issues with the Existing Workflow
High Cost: LucidLink is a significant expense, especially since accounts are billed month-to-month and costs are passed on to companies.
User Experience Challenges: Some users with low-spec devices (e.g., MacBook Air with limited RAM) experience slow speeds and suboptimal performance.
Limited Support: Company teams frequently troubleshoot LucidLink issues independently due to slow or inadequate vendor support, leading to operational inefficiencies and downtime risks.
Fragmented Systems: The workflow is spread across multiple platforms for asset management, review, and storage, complicating collaboration and increasing the risk of version control issues.
Lack of Integrated MAM: Reliance on external tools like Frame.io for reviewing and commenting adds complexity and limits searchability and metadata management within a single environment.
How Shade Would Change Their Workflow
Shade offers an all-in-one cloud platform that integrates file streaming technology, a built-in media asset management system, and review and approval workflows within a single interface. This consolidation would allow the company to:
- Stream and edit proxies remotely with similar or better performance at a lower price point compared to LucidLink.
- Use Shade’s native MAM features including metadata labeling, searchable asset libraries, and collaborative commenting without needing third-party tools.
- Improve customer support responsiveness with Shade’s global engineering team providing 24/7 assistance, reducing troubleshooting burden on company teams.
- Simplify billing and vendor management by consolidating multiple tools into one platform.
- Enhance scalability and flexibility to accommodate different company preferences while standardizing the core workflow around Shade.
Benefits
- Cost savings compared to existing LucidLink subscription fees.
- Improved user experience for remote editors, especially on lower-spec hardware.
- Faster, more reliable vendor support reducing downtime and troubleshooting time.
- Unified platform for storage, MAM, review, and collaboration.
- Enhanced metadata management and asset searchability supporting marketing and editorial teams.
- Streamlined workflows that reduce complexity and increase operational efficiency.