Back to Workflows

Creative Media Company Managing Digital Assets

Company Situation

The company is a mid-sized creative and media production company focused on content creation and digital asset management. Their team includes IT leadership and various creative professionals who manage and produce large volumes of video and multimedia content. They also work with multiple external creative collaborators and rely heavily on cloud-based storage and collaborative tools.

Existing Workflow

Currently, the company uses a variety of tools for managing their digital assets and creative workflows. Their main storage and file streaming solution is LucidLink, complemented by video review and approval platforms such as Frame.io, and media transfer tools like Media Shuttle. For everyday file storage and sharing, they also use Google Drive. This setup is somewhat fragmented, with multiple tools serving overlapping purposes.

Issues with the Existing Workflow

High Cost: LucidLink storage is very expensive, putting pressure on budgets. Fragmented Tools: The creative infrastructure is piecemeal, requiring users to jump between several applications, leading to inefficiencies. Search Limitations: Searching for assets depends heavily on strict naming conventions, metadata tagging, and institutional knowledge, which is cumbersome and error-prone. Administrative Overhead: Managing multiple tools with overlapping features increases administrative work and complicates workflows. Content Repurposing Challenges: Difficulty in finding existing assets reduces the ability to reuse content, increasing the likelihood of costly reshoots or recreations. Versioning Issues: Some users rely on older software versions because certain features are missing in newer releases, complicating workflows further.

How Shade Would Change Their Workflow

Shade proposes to unify and consolidate their creative infrastructure by combining the best features of LucidLink and Frame.io into a single, streamlined system of record. Shade’s platform enhances asset management with AI-powered metadata generation and natural language search capabilities, enabling users to find assets based on content context rather than file names or rigid folder structures. This approach reduces the reliance on institutional knowledge and manual tagging. Shade also facilitates more efficient content repurposing by making archived footage and assets easily discoverable. Overall, Shade would modernize their workflow by centralizing storage, simplifying search, and reducing costs related to multiple overlapping tools.

Benefits

  • Consolidated creative infrastructure replacing multiple, costly tools
  • Reduced storage costs through more efficient asset management
  • AI-driven metadata and natural language search to find assets easily without relying on file names or manual tagging
  • Increased content repurposing—companies have seen up to 43% more reuse of existing assets
  • Lower administrative overhead with a single system of record
  • Improved user experience with less time spent on downloading, uploading, and managing dispersed files
  • Future-proofing workflows with features that support both current and archival content needs